Week Three
This week’s topic of Robotics and Art was very
familiar to me, as both of my history classes covered things Professor Vesna
discussed (such as R.U.R, The Ford Assembly Line, Frankenstein, etc.). as
Professor Vesna earlier stated in her lecture, mechanization and
industrialization not only effect art but it effects our daily lives as well
(Vesna Lecture Part 2). I believe this is true after thinking about how robotics
such as machines pretty much rule our daily lives. As stated by Walter Benjamin
in his essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”, robotics
and technology is not always positive (Benjamin P.1-7). When thinking about
robotics and art, the subject I want to talk about mechanization and
industrialization, more specifically the assembly line. The assembly line began
with Henry Ford while making his Model-T cars in the early 1900’s. The assembly
line started out with just humans working in a line and quickly doing a small
part of a big job. Quickly after the assembly line evolved with the revolution
of technology, machines began to do the work of humans. In turn, humans in
assembly lines were quickly replaced with machines.
Ford Assembly Line in the 1900's |
A movie that exemplifies this
transformation of the assembly line is Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Charlie’s
father was working in a toothpaste factory screwing on toothpaste lids when the
owners brought in a mechanical arm like tool to take the place of Charlie’s father
to screw on toothpaste lids. This movie also helps to accurately represent the
issues society had with the mechanization with assembly lines.
Charlie's Father getting the notice of being fired after his job was taken by a machine |
So many jobs
were taken away with the introduction of these tools, which in turn there was
no economic stability within families. These consequences were negative for the
regular people while the positives came for the business owners. Bringing in
these machines allowed business owners to save money in the long run. The less
people they had on staff, the less money they had to give out to employees. The
machine may have costed a ton of money but in the long run the machine pays for
itself with the money they save from cutting employees. Society reacted two
different ways in terms of industrialization and mechanization. Some welcomed it
while others were against it.
Charlie Chaplin, A satire degrading the assembly line
Works
Cited
Benjamin,
Walter. “The Work of Art in Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Marxists.
N.p.. Web. 17 Apr. 2017.
TheCharlesChaplin.
"Charlie Chaplin - Factory Work." YouTube. YouTube, 18
June 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2017.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfGs2Y5WJ14>.
Ford.
"Innovation: 100 Years of the Moving Assembly Line | Ford Motor
Company." Ford Corporate. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2017.
<http://corporate.ford.com/innovation/100-years-moving-assembly-line.html>.
Tondera,
Marta. "That Magical Technology." What Can We Learn About
Technology from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory? N.p., n.d. Web. 19
Apr. 2017.
<http://thatmagicaltechnology.blogspot.com/2014/11/what-can-we-learn-about-technology-from.html>.
Vesna, Victoria. "Robotics + Art Lecture 2."
Los Angeles. 17 Apr. 2017. Lecture.
I agree with the part which you talk about how jobs which were taken away with the advancement of machinery led to economic instability within families. This is what created the societal distrust between Americans and robotics, unfortunately. It's interesting to think how mechanical advancements can lead to societal strife in regards to the American work force.
ReplyDelete